I practiced non violent communication yesterday. Well not really. I practiced it in my head and rethought through my reaction to a situation that had me steaming. But I struggled a lot and I did not speak violently.
I have the whole back-story written out if anyone cares to know it, but I suddenly realized I may have been spouting off form my own benefit and just boring others. It is hard to know what people read for. But this is long enough without the backstory.
But, the short version is the leader of a meditation sangha, I am part of, has told us he no longer has an interest or need for the Buddhism practice the group was founded around. He has been touting a new guru who guides people in a self inquiry method to get to the heart of pretty much the same base the Buddha taught, “no self” or being in “awareness.” I don’t care for it.
I have never converted to Buddhism, but I like the message of the Dzogchen lineage that I have been exposed to. For me it is right–on-target and effective. I “sit”/ meditate almost daily and it is a routine I carry with me.
There is nothing wrong with the message this guru offers. It is about looking behind the thoughts and the individual and recognizing another view and getting beyond the words. It is not as rich and meaningful for me however. And I am not comfortable with my sangha leader’s tone and demanding that he be understood. And I just don’t want it.
I found myself very angry and “fed up” with him yesterday and could not sit in the circle at one point and got up. And then of course I was disappointed with my reaction to him. After all, I was sitting in his sangha. Not mine. So I brought myself back to the circle out of respect and half listened to what he was saying to a participant and internally pieced out what I was going through so that if I opened my mouth, I would be constructive and not destructive. Because of course, my point in speaking would be to be heard and listened too and taken seriously.
So I went through my thoughts. I sorted out if I was actually angry and tried to lay out for myself what he was doing actually:
- Speaking a lot.
- Instructing a woman using words that I had no emotional connection with and disliked his using.
- Pushing his sangha member on something she had not really invited him to do.
- Although, to his credit, he did ask her, after starting in on her, if it was alright that he drilled her. She said “yes it is.” Did she mean it, or was that a coerced because of the group setting?
Anyway, I broke it down to things he was doing vs. what I wanted from him as my sangha leader. Then I realized he was not going to give me those things anymore. Did that make him wrong? Well I still have concern about his new adoration of his guru and his pressuring of us all that we should see what he sees. And then I asked myself, if something bothers me that much, often it means I should face it head on, does that mean I should investigate the guru or does that mean I should face the sangha leader?
I never opened my mouth to him during sangha. I was still filled with anger and I new I could not say words that were non-violent and was concerned with shutting him down instead of getting him to listen and value what I said. But I saw the value of the lessons. I practiced silently for the future.